I did moderately well at the Iowa City Open, with 3.0/4.0. My horrible lack of sleep the night before made things difficult, luckily all four games were pretty straightforward. It also helped that the tournament was only about two blocks from where I live, so I got to go home and rest between rounds. In the third round, I played Jiahua Zhang, a young player who in early 2009 I told Hank Anzis was going to be a strong player sometime in the next few years. Here it is a year and a half later, over 600 points later for Jiahua, and him coming off a nice draw against an expert, I knew I had my work cut out for me. The opening and middlegame of this game were nearly nonexistent. It felt like it just went 1. e4 c5 2. Rxe8+ and endgame. Because of this, there was obviously no room for a flashy attack. So I just did what I always do when I'm playing a dangerous young player, I just out-endgame them. For all my flashy attacks, I actually think my chances are better in any given ending than any given middlegame. Don't get discouraged by this video being about endgames, I still try to keep it interesting by adding in lots of pretty colors. Enjoy and share your thoughts in the comments!
Wednesday, June 23, 2010
Like Jeremy's Chess Adventures on facebook!
Subscribe to this Blog!
Posts
Posts
Custom Search
4 comments:
I remember you playing Jiahua in Ankeny in 2008 and telling me he was going to be really good. How come you had to play goffstein in round 2?
I would assume I had to play Goffstein since colors were crazy. Aside from that there was no reason I should have had to have played him in round 2. I was 6 of 13 with one point after the first round, so it really does confuse me.
Didn't look like there were any upsets in round 1. Was the TD using a computer or just flipping coins?
I think it was computer pairings.
Post a Comment